Categories
art artificial intelligence creative writing entrepreneurs fiction news opinion poetry women writing

Main Character Energy: How you can use it as an artist or writer

As creatives, we face the constant need for an effective strategy for sharing our work online. I thought about ‘main character syndrome’ and I believe that the ‘energy’ might offer useful principles for building brand recognition.

Have you ever heard the term ‘main character energy‘? It’s one way to describe charisma or chutzpah. Main character energy is a combination of bravery, confidence, and attention-seeking. You need the right amount to get people to listen to you. Unfortunately, many creative people are anxious and introverted, so in the spotlight, they can become overwhelmed quite quickly.

You know that someone is doing too much self-promotion when you get exhausted from seeing their name or avatar in your news feeds. When you become oversaturated, you’re now looking at ‘main character syndrome‘. You’ll see it with celebrities who pay click farms to keep their names trending on social media. And, you’ll also see them on podcasts whining about the toxic parasocial relationships caused by that very same overexposure they engineered. In other words, if posting to social media gives you a hit of dopamine, or you feel compelled to hit the ‘post’ button every ten minutes, you are no longer doing business.

The ‘look at me’ problem

Apart from famous people whose thirst for attention becomes toxic, we can easily think of everyday people with main character syndrome. According to the Cleveland Clinic, “main character syndrome is defined by a series of behaviors in which you see yourself as the main character in the story of your life. You are the protagonist and everyone else is often a sidekick or a villain.” One example that springs to mind is the mother-in-law who insisted on wearing her wedding dress to her son’s wedding.

Oversaturation, in my opinion, works best for objects or dead people. I’m thinking of the Mona Lisa or the Palace of Versailles. Or historical figures like Elizabeth I or Nelson Mandela. We recognise them from iconic images representing them at the height of their fame. For living individuals, icon status is difficult to attain because authenticity is a vital part of an artist’s brand management strategy. In spite of this, to remain relevant, many famous people do bizarre things so we can stare at them.

They also spend lots of money on social media teams who come up with bizarre audience engagement strategies. They hire stylists and pay to be featured in mainstream publications. Their shortcuts might not work for you, however. And if you try to copy them by saturating your social media timelines with posts, your tactics will backfire.

Visibility with intention is a better alternative. The idea is to see yourself as a storyteller. This will make it easy for you to set clear goals for showcasing your creative work. You want to tell a story that your audience finds interesting or entertaining.

With this idea in mind, let me share with you some ways you can build up your brand identity. Read on and find out how you can “overexpose” your creative work using main character energy.

Objectify yourself

Develop a unique symbol or logo associated with your creative persona. This icon can serve as a consistent visual element across digital platforms, making your brand instantly recognisable. Create several personas and icons for each. Cycle through these as needed.

Establish a signature style that becomes synonymous with your brand. Whether it’s a specific tone, colour palette, or choice of themes, a distinctive creative style will help people to recognise your work easily.

Cultivate a mythos around yourself. Tell stories, show behind-the-scenes videos or photos, or share unique rituals associated with your creative process. Adding layers to your persona gives your work more staying power. Further, create an enigmatic online persona by carefully selecting what aspects of your life and work to share. Keep an air of mystery around your creative process and personal life. Curiosity adds to the allure of your work.

Collaborate with yourself. If you’re a writer, consider using illustrations, graphics, or video clips to showcase your work. If you’re a fine artist, find a story or poem that matches your artwork so your audience can connect with it more closely. With this technique you externalise your brand with fresh, visually appealing iterations of your work.

Release limited edition or special versions of your work. You could create a video trailer or slideshow for your artwork or writing. Or you could do a voiceover narration on one specific platform. Thereafter, images with excerpts go on your blog. Limiting styles to different platforms adds a feeling of rarity to your creative work. It also encourages discovery across platforms. This in turn enhances the perceived value of your work.

Outro: Self-reflection and goal-setting

When you promote your creative work online, main character energy is what you’ll tap into. In other words, you are making your creative work the main character in your brand story. This makes it easier for you to reinvent yourself without oversaturating your broadcast channels. It’s possible to regularly showcase your work while maintaining a sense of exclusivity and originality.

However, before starting each campaign, you’ll need to set clear goals for your online presence. Bear in mind your values and the impact you want to make with your creative work. Elevate your presentations with distinctive symbols, a signature style, and timeless themes. Your creative journey is unique, so let your story unfold authentically and your audience will embrace you.

Categories
marriage men news opinion technology women writing

Queen Mary of Denmark or, was Prince Frederik’s affair scandal a masterstroke?

From right, HM Queen Margrethe II of Denmark, Prince Christian, Crown Prince Frederik, Crown Princess Mary

Let’s go back around 23 years to a meeting with Daisy. She and Fred were locked in a battle of wills over his relationship with an Australian lawyer. It was reported that Fred threatened to never get married if Daisy forbade him to propose to the woman he loved.

The Queen gave in, and four years later, Fred and Mary exchanged vows in a glamorous ceremony. Mary became our modern day Cinderella, and her journey from real estate attorney to Crown Princess of Denmark put Fred firmly on the map as a real-life Prince Charming. In other words, his love story was really all about Mary.

Over the years, there has been wide speculation as to whether Daisy would step aside and allow Fred to take over. However, in 2022, in an interview with UK’s ITV, she firmly stated her intention to never quit her job because she was inspired by Queen Elizabeth II.

A little over a year later, out of nowhere, photographs of Fred standing with his suitcase at a bus stop in Spain, chucking (a mobile phone) into a trash bin, caused heads to explode worldwide. Prince Charming had made himself the main character of the story, and his actions plunged his family’s legacy into chaos. Everyone felt bad for Mary, his wife of 20 years. She had borne him four children, and not only forgot how to speak English by the time their engagement was announced, but also promised to spend the rest of her life coughing up her consonants.

So here I am, at almost 3:00 a.m. wondering if I should bin a blog post I wrote to congratulate Her Majesty Queen Mary of Denmark. It felt too clean. I presented her as a perfectly curated avatar of regal elegance, stepping out of cars the right way, smiling enough, and never speaking above a whisper. My bad mind started whirring and my spider senses started tingling. I asked myself, was Fred’s alleged affair a genuine misstep, or the calculated flex of a genius? What, for the love of Christ, was he thinking?

Because I like convoluted stories, I decided to use game theory. I considered some strategies and payoffs. Imagine the board: Daisy, reigning until her final breath. Fred, the restless prince, waiting, waiting, waiting, until maybe the age of 72, to start the job.

My theory was that he engineered what appeared to be a romantic tryst, as a flick you to Daisy. Indeed, as soon as the images started circulating, out poured public scorn for the monarchy. In Denmark, 85% of the public support the Royal Family, but the voices of republicans were being amplified. The alleged other woman has reportedly run back to her former spouse and is taking refuge at his home somewhere in Spain.

In other words, was the “Affair scandal of Crown Prince Frederik and Genoveva Casanova” a theatrical production, with Fred sacrificing his reputation as a faithful husband to force Daisy to quit? Game theory says, “Yes, maybe, who knows?”

Predicting human behavior is tricky because motives change, intentions shift, and outcomes are unpredictable. Fred could be a puppet master, which is likely, given that he graduated from Harvard and trained with the US Navy Seals. Or perhaps he was a man baby caught up in his own sense of entitlement. Because who has ever heard of a Prince Genius? If you were born into a job with inherited wealth, common sense is a bonus but is not necessary. History tells us of Charles I and James I, two English monarchs who insisted on being the main characters even as others were writing a different story.

Let’s review my scenarios:

Master Manipulator. Fred crafts a fake scandal, knowing it will sting enough to make Daisy quit and offer him the throne. Risky? Yes, but the potential reward, accession before the age of 72, is worth the reputational burns.

Failed Architect. Perhaps Fred’s not that good at scheming. He has been caught in compromising situations before but always had a response ready. He is prepared to say, you are only looking at photos of him leaving an attractive socialite’s apartment early in the morning. This time, there is a strong reaction from the public. Daisy sees the backlash, and tells Fred he’s not ready to reign.

Utter chaos. Fred did some things. According to the press reports emerging at the moment, Daisy’s abdication is directly related to the marital discord caused by her son’s alleged affair. These reports serve as confirmation that the allegations concerning Fred’s indiscretions are true. Very disappointing, indeed.

As I dictated that last sentence, I was reminded that King Juan Carlos I “gave” his mistress, Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn €65 million as a “gift”, and later tried to get it back. Instead of giving back the money, she sued him so he would stop calling her. The takeaway here is that privilege can make people do weird things, like accept millions of dollars from shady corporate entities. Or, leave a whole family in a castle in Denmark and travel to Spain for a sleepover with another woman.

I have enjoyed writing fiction stories about monarchs, but I finally understand why people want them to go away. Yes, wealth and prestige are the obvious perquisites, but we should rethink the practice of birthing humans into a lifetime of endless public scrutiny and pampered, airy do-nothingness.

Prince Christian greets his grandmother Queen Maegrethe II, along with his younger siblings and parents

Being a monarch is not a dream role for anyone who wants the freedom to live on their own terms. I’m sure that if you ask Princess Charlene of Monaco, she will tell you she tried really hard to escape a life many women covet. The media loves telling the story of the prince who forced a white South African swimmer to marry into extreme wealth, knowing she didn’t like him. They won’t talk about why he didn’t offer the same deal to the Togolese flight attendant with whom he had a son.

We live in tumultuous times and a royal scandal is pixelated escapism. Thus, there may not be much sympathy for royal consorts who become victims of their own aspirations. But, in my opinion, we should at least let them keep their personal lives out of the public domain.

These days, anyone can become a global influencer, and that’s a good thing. It’s also good that today’s self-made moguls are finding out that with fame, wealth and influence come jealousy, scrutiny, and the constant threat of backlash. The age of fairy tales and sorcery is far behind us. Now that we are here, in a new era, we should work to redefine what it means to live happily ever after.

Categories
creative writing men news opinion technology writing

Twitter’s rate limit exceeded: A post-mortem 

Months ago, when I explained Elon Musk’s extreme self-absorption in a blog post, I was told off because what billionaires do must be correct and “smart”. A week after that post was published, everything I said about Musk was corroborated in news reports. According to some software programmers working at Twitter, they were contacted in the early hours one morning after the Super Bowl.

The programmers were told there was an “urgent situation”. Musk was upset because President Biden got more views on his tweet. The programmers were ordered to rewrite the code for the platform so that Musk’s tweets would be served to the home feed of every account. Instead of acting more professionally after being caught out, Musk now sends the press the poop emoji when they ask him to comment on stories about himself.

But my point is that I was able to speak on Musk’s character and accurately predict his motives because I was paying attention to his behaviour, and it fit a pattern. Please note that I have kept adding postscripts to that post because Twitter’s devolution is relentless. 

Twitter CEO Elon Musk announces name change to X (after Threads drama) 

At 05:30 on Sunday, July 2, I opened up my Twitter app to look for updates from France, which was on fire. After a few scrolls down the trending page, I got a notification which read “rate limit exceeded”. I hadn’t used Twitter all that week so I was confused. When I tried to check my own profile, I couldn’t see my own tweets. I could tweet and reply from my notifications but I could not delete anything from my own timeline. Naturally, I threw an epic tantrum. 

By Wednesday, I was raring to go on Threads by Meta. It’s no surprise that the new microblogging app got 100 million signups within a week. You see, Elon Musk’s ego had got the better of him and he switched off (what he thinks is) his customers’ dopamine supply. In some countries, however, Twitter is a utility – an emergency hotline in case of natural disasters. For businesses, it’s where they do customer care. Small businesses use the app to network with potential partners and find new customers. 

Fast forward three weeks, and I’m reaching again for the face slap emoji. This post was originally set to private, but I exhumed it after reading that Musk announced he was looking to change Twitter’s logo to an “X”. To be perfectly frank, I’m quite bored with his late night sh*tposting. He’s dosing with ketamine (when executives take drugs at work it’s called “microdosing for mental health” but if you’re a pleb you go to jail), so I wouldn’t be surprised if another quarter passes and the logo doesn’t get changed.

Integrity and dignity: A refresher   

Swirling around us is a palpable lack of reverence for ostentatious wealth. And we know why that happens: Some people have used their power and privilege to benefit themselves at the expense of others. Their supporters allow them to get away with things that they would never tolerate for ordinary people. But what many of us still fail to realise is that wealthy people throw tantrums at scale. And the “rate limit exceeded” drama is an example of a wealthy person having a massive tantrum and misusing their power.

Before I continue this Twitter post-mortem, let me take a moment to review two concepts which are relevant to this discussion. Integrity is the quality of having strong moral principles. It means being truthful, fair, and consistent in one’s actions. Dignity means having a sense of self-worth and treating others with respect, regardless of their social status or position in life. People with dignity and integrity are trustworthy and reliable. I feel that Musk is neither trustworthy nor reliable and this is why he treats Twitter’s users like they’re programmable software and not real people.

The Twitter is over party

At 06:00 on July 2, I logged in on a different device so I could find out what was going on. I read reports that Twitter had not renewed its Google Cloud contract, which expired on June 30. But soon, my direct messages and tweets were vaporised and I couldn’t use the app at all. 

A few people said that Twitter was in self DDoS mode because the code was edited to force people to log in. Elsewhere, Muskovites claimed he was a hero for fighting “bots” (forgetting that an army of them pump up his engagement on there, but c’est la guerre). My theory is quite different. When I saw Musk replying to his own tweet to humblebrag that his post achieved the highest view count ever, at over half a billion views, I understood that this was his true objective. 

France and Belgium were burning and tweeters couldn’t communicate with their networks to get information out. In Japan, where Twitter is a utility, users were worried that they’d be cut off from life saving updates during a flood or earthquake. Ukraine is still being invaded by Russia. Imagine being the world’s richest human and openly obsessing about your tweet views (a cosmetic feature) while people are fighting to live.

This is what happened, in my opinion. By late Saturday afternoon (US time zones) on July 1, most Twitter users were following news stories and commenting on events. Days earlier, SCOTUS said it was okay for businesses to refuse to serve clients they didn’t agree with. Against the human rights implications of this development, it is easy to imagine that tweeters were quite uninterested in reading more of Musk’s gibberish. During Pride Month, he was liking transphobic tweets and people told him off. On top of that, I believe he was frustrated by everyone’s focus on “not him” and he put the platform on timeout. Now that all eyes are on him, he seems to be stuck repeating himself.  

Postscript: July 24, 2023. So the logo change took place already. However, Twitter’s branding is still there. On my Chrome browser, the platform is called “twitter.com”, and the posts are called “tweets.” It’s really slap dash but we’ll see.

Categories
art creative writing fiction news opinion technology TV women writing

What’s missing? The context of cancel culture

The essence of cancel culture 

One thing Generation X can take credit for is that we grew up with tangible media. These included books, newspapers, handwritten letters, postcards, vinyl records, cassette and VHS tapes, cinemas, stages, and physical photo albums. My theory is that as children, as we interacted with these objects, our brains grew to truly understand the meaning of “context.” 

When we closed a book, the story ended, at least, until we were ready to continue reading. We knew, without being told, that what we read in a newspaper was different from the dialogue in a novel. One story was based on fact, and the other was totally made up. When you pushed the eject button, the VHS tape popped out of the VCR, and the movie was over. Currently, we buy vinyl records from specialty stores; visit galleries to look at paintings; take walks in the park; and take photos with film cameras. So what’s missing, and why are we so miserable? 

In our digital age, I believe that more and more of us are losing the capacity to separate content (and text) from context. And it makes us more anxious because the stories we are fed never have an exit button so we can shut them down. When people can’t unplug, we see cancel culture, where some people are publicly shamed for saying or doing things that others consider offensive or unacceptable. 

Of course, there is plenty out there that is offensive or unacceptable. But in a culture of instant gratification and self-affirming narratives, those definitions are changing constantly. And this is why cancel culture makes us miserable. Our brains are struggling to place things in the proper context. We get frustrated quickly and destroy things instead of turning them off.

Consider the context

And this is not a Millennial/Gen Z issue. It happens even with Generation X. Look at one Gen-Xer’s comment on a coronation declaration I wrote for my second novel. The story is set in a fictional country, Maitheland, in an alternate timeline to this one, in 2033. The main Orthodox religion in that timeline is also fictional.

The ecclesiastical portion of a coronation scene? [This story must] be set pre-20th Century because there aren’t too many of those anymore. The last was Britain’s Elizabeth II in 1953. Spain’s King Juan Carlos I just swore a Freemasonic oath of office in 1975. Which explains why the contemporary Spanish monarchy has been such a disaster.

Reader’s comment

I found this response to my work unsettling because it disregarded the stated context of the declaration. The characters I wrote about are not based on any existing royal family. Was it necessary to question the historical provenance of a fictional ceremony?

While this was not a cancellation, it is an example of judgement out of context. This is the essence of cancel culture. Instead of observing and noticing things from a distance, people try to write themselves into a situation.

As I mentioned in the introduction, tangible media like books, vinyl records, and photo albums helped to shape my generation’s understanding of context through storytelling. These objects provided concrete instances for our developing brains to sort out the differences between real and made-up events. However, as we consume more interactive media, we are able to write ourselves into any story even when we are not invited to do so.

Stories and empathy development

Stories helped us to learn how to be the underdog, the prince, the fighter jet pilot, or the ambulance driver. High quality stories were better at helping us to use our imagination. They also helped us develop critical thinking skills. With every reading, we had the chance to experience the story from a new character’s perspective. During playtime, we created costumes and designed our own immersive environments. A lot of the things we did during playtime helped us to connect with our bodies and be aware of the world around us. Later, that awareness could be transferred to an understanding of the physical and emotional experiences of others. 

Nowadays, we are trained to talk about ourselves and do frequent checks for engagement. When we are constantly being judged and criticised, we may become less likely to express ourselves honestly for fear of being ostracised. Ironically, this can cause us to be less compassionate towards each other. Instead of making people better, cancel culture can lead to decreased empathy.

I feel that our brains are becoming more vulnerable to stress and anxiety because we use the same devices to do a range of things: work, play, communicate, relax, stay fit, and study. Adding to this problem is the blurring of lines when real events are used to create entertaining stories, or when fictional events are used to comment on current social issues. For example, we see grown men posting videos on YouTube in which they complain that Disney’s The Little Mermaid cast a young woman with tan complexion to “attack fathers.” Of course, the film was made for children but these men were outraged anyway.

The more we adapt to changing technologies, the more we forget the guidance that helped us to become sensible people. As adults we hear the term “work life balance”. It suggests that we need to relax, but we are not specifically reminded that we should focus on the physical world.

Instead, we are encouraged to do “adulting” activities on our favourite social media platforms. There, we watch someone painting a wall, comment as someone cooks a meal, and then listen as a book we purchased is analysed for us. Even romantic partners are taught that relationship maintenance is as easy as watching TV shows together.

Eventually, constant stimulation from being online becomes overwhelming. The blurring of lines between real and fictional events can lead to anxiety and stress. Instead of reducing that stress by logging off, many of us respond by attempting to control the individuals who appear on our screens.

Outro: Read printed books

There are plenty of stories to read, and we are buying more than a billion printed books every year. But are we turning the pages? Effective communication, conflict resolution, teamwork, empathy, and resilience are themes we can find in books. Turning the pages of a book tells our brain that we are following characters on a journey. By witnessing their struggles, we subconsciously construct templates for addressing similar challenges in our own lives.

Interacting with characters in our minds also helps us to empathise with ourselves. We need to be kind to ourselves in order to be resilient. As we grow stronger, we will become less interested in forcing other people to do (or say) what we want. 

The evolving landscape of digital media consumption is bringing up new challenges for future generations to resolve. Thankfully, the studies that have been conducted suggest that digital media can play a role in shaping our empathy and resilience. I believe that there is a conscious effort among us to use digital media to foster empathy and understanding. But there’s a physical world out there with things we can enjoy, too. We should remember that our minds are delicate. And if any of us had the right guidance in our developing years, now is a good time to reflect on the many soft skills they have taught us.

Categories
art creative writing news women writing

Brand Dilution: A Handbook for Artists

Brand dilution happens when the value of an artist’s work decreases due to its association with less desirable events or behaviour. This can happen when an artist overshares on social media, posts too many selfies, or collaborates with too many different brands. When an artist’s brand becomes diluted, it can be difficult for viewers and potential collectors to understand what the artist stands for.

With the emergence of new social media platforms, artists have plenty of opportunities to reach a wider audience and build their brand presence. And yet, for artists with lots of projects, it can be difficult to plan or even create content for various social media accounts.

Thus, another way to dilute a brand is to maintain no brand presence at all. I’m sure you’ve seen Instagram accounts with one post from 2018, or an abandoned Twitter account that has been taken over by bots. In other words, some exposure is good, while excessive self-promotion can lead to catastrophic results. One of the biggest challenges for artists is therefore building brand presence without diluting it (too much). Read ahead for a summary of three common examples of brand dilution and how to avoid them.

The Unfiltered Diary

This is content created by an artist who shares every intimate detail of their personal life, including relationship troubles, health issues, and emotional struggles, on social media. When Kanye West does it, (like making his new wife, Bianca Censori, wear sheer tights as trousers), we think it’s funny.

But when a regular artist shares a photo of their dog’s bottom at the pet hospital, complete with a caption explaining what was in there, it’s gross. A post like that makes you worry about the artist’s mental health. Of course, ‘mad’ artists are popular, but usually after they left Earth for about one hundred years. And their amazing work outshines any hardship they may have suffered in the past. Think Beethoven or Van Gogh.

While the artist gets attention for raw honesty, over time, they become known for their personal struggles rather than their talent. The constant focus on personal issues overwhelms their work. This leads to dilution because viewers don’t have the energy to separate the artist’s personal life from their creative output. Some sensitive viewers avoid the artist’s social media posts for fear of seeing unpleasant things. This reduces the artist’s reach, influence, and impact.

The Mundane Chronicles

This is content created by an artist who documents every aspect of their daily routine on social media, from waking up, to cooking meals, to running errands. This level of openness is relatable in small amounts. A daily, well-curated reel on Instagram with the right ambient music can be a welcome pick-me-up.

But constant sharing of mundane activities can overtake the artist’s actual artwork. Think Madonna trying to scrub her toilet in lingerie from Dolce & Gabbana. It was funny and grotesque and probably a parody. Sadly, younger people forgot that she used to be a singer and wonder why she simply doesn’t “just stop”.

Similarly, the artist who tweets stray thoughts every ten minutes will grate on the algorithm’s nerves and might see their posts deboosted. That artist’s account becomes associated with trivial aspects of life, and an algorithm might run interference to spare everyone the details. Some artists complaining about “shadowbanning” fall into this category. Unfortunately, rather than sharing their vision or skill, the artist diluted the impact of their own work because they posted (or used) too much filler.

The Constant Self-Promoter

Most artists choose to post about their own achievements so that potential clients can see what they have to offer. These posts are usually accompanied by meaningful insights and engaging commentary. These kinds of updates have value for an engaged audience.

While self-promotion is important, excessive self-centeredness can be a turnoff. This is a tightrope walk because artists need to consistently promote themselves in order to stay visible. Additionally, it’s natural for an artist who is passionate about their newest project to feel excited about sharing their work.

However, showcasing too much can lead to burnout for the artist. They may feel pressured to produce new work in order to stay relevant. Ironically, artists who are worried about this may find it difficult to focus on their work. Think Cardi B showcasing her various collaborations with other rappers even as her fans keep asking her when she’s going to release a new album.

A sign of dilution is when the artist’s audience starts offering advice on how to avoid being distracted. That is an indicator that the artist has shifted to a relentless self-promotional agenda.

For the ordinary artist, sharing important announcements through friends or other third parties is ideal. The Prince and Princess of Wales use their Instagram and YouTube accounts sparingly. They share very short video clips of their projects and rely on mainstream/tabloid media to share the details. Artists can emulate this by creating a separate channel (or account) for showcasing promotional events like media interviews, collabs, and exhibits. On a more personal channel, frequent promotion could potentially alienate viewers and collectors and should be avoided.

Outro: Be Mysterious

There is a fine line between clever promotional ideas and appearing unprofessional. Hyperactivity diminishes uniqueness and relatability. Artists who neglect personal boundaries risk undermining the very qualities that make their work captivating. The best way to maintain intrigue is to leave room for interpretation. By doing this, artists can build a stronger connection with their audiences while protecting their unique vision.

Categories
artificial intelligence creative writing news opinion technology women writing

X / Twitter: Linda Yaccarino is the new CEO

Linda Yaccarino

When Elon Musk announced that there was going to be a new CEO for Twitter, I almost cried because I am so tired of seeing ignorant people tweeting there, and I thought he was going to hire an enabler.

Indeed, Musk’s fans were hoping the new CEO would continue supporting their 24-hour fiesta of debauchery, name-calling, misinformation, and their torrents of racist dog whistles. For some fans, ‘free speech’ means they can tweet abusive remarks at people they disagree with, or pay bots to promote meme coins.

By now, most of you know that Musk’s biggest fans are flat earth proponents who believe that outer space is Photoshopped. (Never mind that their saviour runs a company which is the antithesis of that very idea).

In fact, if you were looking at trending topics on Twitter right after the new CEO was announced, you would have seen the AI-generated character, Aiko, making the rounds as the Musk mob’s candidate of choice. In this case, Aiko represents their views on women leaders: Women can only pretend to be leaders during pre-coital costume play. It’s hard for them to conceive of a reality in which women wield power and influence in business.

Into this scenario walks Linda Yaccarino. At nearly sixty years old, she has been a strong advocate for diversity and inclusion in the advertising industry. The former chairperson of global advertising at NBC Universal is well-dressed, wears thick glasses, and her boobs are not poking out of her blazer. She also chairs the WEF’s task force on the future of work. Naturally, the Musk mob, realising that their uncle Elon was hiring a real woman and not gifting them with a virtual call girl, lost their collective sh*t.

It’s funny that the left hates him so much. They claim to love clean energy; but they hate Musk the world’s biggest clean energy champion. They claim want to support women rising up in business / corporate world but when someone actually tries to advance that …

I don’t think he’s doing it because of gender equality, etc either. He just finds the best people for the job.

Originally tweeted by Whole Mars Catalog (@WholeMarsBlog) on May 12, 2023.

I didn’t realise how much of a dog whistle their opposition was until I looked up Yaccarino’s credentials. This person has created initiatives to encourage more women and people of color to enter the advertising field as professionals. She has also worked to create more inclusive advertising campaigns that reflect the diversity of the world we live in. Suddenly, the Musk mob’s strong opposition to her appointment started to make sense.

Yaccarino believes that advertising needs to be more inclusive. Indeed, advertising has been used to shape public opinion and influence people’s lives. The incoming CEO argues that when advertising is more inclusive, it can help to create a more just and equitable society. I really want to see more of that. And if you’ve ever been confronted by hostility from people who believe that inclusivity is unnecessary or harmful, you’ll know that she has a lot of work to do.

Let’s review a few objections:

  • Some people may feel that if more women and people of color are given professional opportunities, it will mean fewer accomplishments for them.
  • Other people may feel that inclusivity is harmful because it takes away the focus on individual merit.
  • Yet others may simply be used to a world where men are in positions of power, and they may not be ready for a world where everyone is treated equally.

No matter how many times you respond that inclusivity can help create a vibrant economy, the message seems to fall on deaf ears. When we say that society benefits if everyone gets a fair chance to succeed, it angers some people. This is why I am glad that X/Twitter was given to someone who has worked to create a more just society.

Hopefully, fair-mindedness will be built into the system and not treated as an afterthought. So far, Yaccarino has done that by looking at data, and listening to what consumers are saying. On Twitter, voices are being muted because of the inherent biases inside the system.

I feel that a peaceful world is a far way off, and something must be done to limit the abuse of protected groups on Twitter. We need a platform where everyone feels safe and welcome, and where everyone has a voice. The appointment of Linda Yaccarino as CEO is a step in the right direction.

Categories
art artificial intelligence creative writing entrepreneurs fashion news opinion technology women writing

Social audio update: Why I quit Clubhouse

Preamble 

In early March, I called it quits with social audio on Clubhouse. I was drawn to the platform out of sheer curiosity. And as you may remember, I had positive results using social audio for promoting my artwork and fiction writing. This happened because of high audience quality and the large number of people I could meet and talk with.

My creative projects received positive feedback from the people I met on Clubhouse. I met the best and the brightest in entertainment, business, and the arts. And because social media audiences kept changing, I pressed pause on some of my creative projects so I could focus on meeting new people.

The time I could spend online promoting my creative projects has been limited. Clubhouse was an amazing workaround. And after many sales of my first novel, I encouraged authors and other creatives to join in and gain a boost from talking to people, exchanging ideas, and building trust. So why would I quit?

Read on as I share my reasons for quitting Clubhouse. After that, I will share some updates on Twitter Spaces, my preferred social audio platform.

Photo by Vinicius Wiesehofer

Community logistics: My reasons for exiting Clubhouse 

Clubhouse was the platform I used to find business leads, learn new ways of thinking (about business), and meet other creatives. I was able to grow my following to 1.8k followers by joining small rooms and talking with people there. I was able to advise listeners and speakers on marketing strategy, business etiquette, and give feedback on their promotional activities. I made connections from communities around the world and I was invited to join an uncountable number of clubs and houses. 

In houses and clubs, the individual members don’t always host or speak in rooms when I’m online. You may also remember that I was aware of the drama on there, and was somewhat entertained by a lot of it. I was not bothered by the drama because I met plenty of professional people. It is called “Clubhouse” after all, and I expected to have a range of experiences on the app.

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio

Sadly, the people I was most interested in meeting ghosted Clubhouse after the pandemic work-at-home period ended. They were able to pivot to other promotional venues and expand their businesses offline and did not need to rely on social audio. As a result, many of us visiting Clubhouse were now forced to share stages with an unsettling concentration of celebrity defamers, segregationists, bullies, pseudo-intellectuals, panhandlers, adult content creators, and dodgy sales people. 

I started to feel anxious as I joined rooms. People were using “witchcraft” and “aliens” to describe issues already addressed by academic research, or treatable by modern medicine. There was no useful business advice to be heard and I started avoiding the app altogether. Too much cringe. The solution? Log out. Permanently. 

Algorithms and reach on Twitter

The social audio feature, Twitter Spaces, was my main reason for opening a new Twitter account in June, 2021. Long story short, Twitter’s algorithm changes now mean that posts from accounts don’t always get sent to the feeds of their followers. And how does this affect Spaces? I will explain.

In early February this year, I noticed a glitch when helping a friend to use a new feature. I couldn’t see his post at the corresponding timestamp in my feed. And there was a 15-minute gap where no posts were served.

Photo by Valeria Ushakova

Not many people on Twitter have software programming skills. And most people I meet barely know how the platform works. I imagine that if their tweets got low views, as a result of that particular glitch, they would blame their followers for ignoring them.

The people I have met on Twitter Spaces came from every time zone you can think of. But from a programming (i.e. problem-solving) perspective, I know they are not going to join Twitter Spaces when their experience with text posting is less than satisfactory. Smart technology is meant to be predictable and responsive to user input. Social audio, and a finely tuned process for using Twitter, were how I built an audience in under two years. But what grownup has time to scour Platformer articles and Reddit forums for the latest “hack”? I would argue that such activities are wasteful because they take us out of a productive and creative headspace.

Twitter has had plenty of changes since the new owner purchased it. And we know that he first changed the algorithms to mostly amplify his tweets. One Monday in March, there was a sitewide outage caused by a single engineer who literally broke Twitter by making a bad configuration change. Don’t believe me? Read about it here. System-level errors like these were happening too often.

Months ago, I would ask people to join my scheduled spaces via private messages. But nowadays, my audience is spending less time on Twitter because of app fragility and low engagement on their tweets. They can’t rely on their notifications for dopamine hits. And because of that, their priorities have moved offline. Good for them.

More and more people are noticing that their followers cannot see their tweets. Someone recently worked out that if your tweet is not connected to a viral topic, it will get deprioritised in the queue (for all tweets sent out on the platform). This is an unfortunate glitch but I can see that it could be used to build more toxic echo chambers.

Twitter is down bad but lots of amazing creatives are still tweeting. The solution? Encourage more of them to follow me on Instagram. Connect with active accounts through pop-up spaces. Use the time to share stories and give feedback on creative projects.

Outro

I still believe in social audio, but quitting Clubhouse was the right decision. I want to spend more time on my creative projects. And of course, I want to connect with people who enjoy my work. For now, I am relying on Instagram and Pinterest to showcase my artwork. On all platforms, I will be deepening my connections with creators I meet. That means reverting to images, video, and text. That’s the best I can do for now.

Categories
artificial intelligence creative writing men news opinion People writing

The Monarchy: Is it time for a change?

On Saturday, May 6, 2023, the people of the United Kingdom and The Commonwealth, and well-wishers from around the world celebrated the Coronation of His Majesty King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Westminster Abbey. The ceremonial rites call back to the coronation of Edgar the Peaceful on April 5, 973, at Bath Abbey. That ceremony, and the rule of King Edgar, helped to establish the authority of the British monarchy.

But right on cue, in spite of the historical significance of the ceremony, Twitter’s trending hashtags became a litter box of dissenting opinions. As always, people made a fair point but missed it at the same time.

Early on during the live event, I noticed that accounts tweeting negative comments were only talking about King Charles III and his family. Positive remarks were made about other monarchs arriving at the event. I thought it was interesting that people were not objecting to monarchies on principle. Maybe they were upset about something taking the attention they wanted for themselves?

What I felt while watching the event was discomfort with the ostentatious transfer of generational wealth. And I felt that way because I grew up in a culture where skin colour was conflated with social status. Sure, efforts were made to represent dark skinned folk at the coronation. But that was because the Royal Family was made to feel self-conscious about asking the public to celebrate nepotism and baked-in social inequality.

The former Prince of Wales did a tremendous amount of work with the Prince’s Trust. Thousands of young people have benefited from his work with the charity. We should never forget that. Certainly, in light of this, continuity and stability are at the heart of the King’s coronation. In more prosperous times, in a just world, this would be an opportunity for celebration and renewal.


But how can we look to the future with hope and optimism knowing that any one of us could have been born that way?

The United Kingdom and the nations that make up the Commonwealth have a long and contentious history. In other words, to celebrate British culture and heritage, we have to acknowledge that in the past, there was looting of national treasure and natural resources.

However, to abolish the monarchy is not to abolish the oppressive systems that rule our world today. There are few industrialised nations that do not have a record of invading other countries. In fact, many financial and political institutions have worked to facilitate the plunder of resources from poorly defended groups. And every day, we lose more of our freedoms to leaders who collude to maintain the unfair advantages they have always enjoyed. The word they use for that is “meritocracy”, but they are the ones who decide who is worthy.

During the coronation, some people with these opinions may have felt isolated from the rest of society. The pomp and pageantry might have amplified their feelings of loneliness. But there is no need for anyone to feel insecure about their place in society. For my part, I do not strive to ‘belong’ in an unjust world.

Upon reflection, the coronation is a reminder of our shortcomings as a civilisation. We give up too much of our authority in order to avoid the burdens of decision-making. And then, we complain when people hold power over us.

We keep monarchies alive because we have been hypnotised into imagining what we could potentially do with the power that comes with a crown. Perhaps, instead of wishing to have an unfair advantage over others, more of us could strive to find peace and contentment in ordinary life.

Of course, it’s complex, and cannot be accomplished without a tremendous amount of time and effort. But if we want to change this society we live in; if we hope for true justice and equity, that is a more helpful and consequential example we should be setting for others.

Categories
art creative writing men news opinion technology women writing

Political neutrality is for OnlyFans: Artists should lead with their values

Geisha Collection

Political neutrality is for OnlyFans and if you’re not on there, you need to lead with your values. The latest buzzword in marketing is “values-based marketing”. That is, showcasing your work in a way that appeals to your customers’ values. It’s everywhere – content creators on YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, or Facebook infuse their titles with their opinions. And I want to share my thoughts on why doing this is good for you. 

The other day, I read a report about Donald J Trump being called a p***y a** b***h by Chrissy Teigen on Twitter and almost having her account shut down by the White House. Not a fan of hers and this post is not about her. But I thought it was really important for artists to not be wishy-washy about expressing our values in a public space. 

Back to the bones

Living and breathing our values builds trust and that in turn helps our audience to find us. We should take a position on certain matters. Our audience wants to know what we think because they want to know why they are supporting us. 

Political neutrality refers to the idea that an individual should not promote a particular political ideology or agenda. A position like this is certainly appropriate for public institutions such as the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and civil service. These institutions must maintain fairness and objectivity in decision-making. They are expected to work without bias towards any particular political party or agenda.

Sold out geisha collection from artist Pinxx
Geisha

However, for artists in a commercial space, achieving complete political neutrality should feel unnatural, because our personal or ideological leanings directly influence our work. Naturally, the main disadvantage of being politically neutral is lack of advocacy. By remaining politically neutral, we may miss opportunities to gain support for causes or policies that we believe in.

As artists, we have the means to express ideas in ways that will appeal to a wide cross section of society. If a cause or policy is in the public interest or if there are vulnerable groups who are affected, we should speak up. Being an artist is a privilege and we must always remember the advantages that creative expression affords us. 

Sharp shooter - 3D portrait
Sharp Shooter

According to recent business research, being politically neutral may prevent us from making good business decisions. One negative consequence of fence-sitting is perceived lack of accountability. Political neutrality is often a way to avoid making tough decisions. An audience will notice that. This can be particularly problematic for a highly visible brand. Quite a number of popular artists have been criticised because of their decision to remain silent on matters that their audiences care about.

Remember the Balenciaga ad scandal? Celebrities were called out for not speaking against the inappropriate presentation of children in that infamous ad campaign. And Taylor Swift got pummelled by her fans for not speaking up when the United States was politically split down the middle.

Geisha 3D artwork
Geisha

This brings me to my concern that in the wider society, political neutrality is a type of privilege. For example, some people want to signal that they are comfortable within the status quo. They can use neutrality to look away from people who are being marginalised or exploited. Or, neutrality could be a mask they use to hide their true beliefs while lobbing rhetorical salvos at their ideological opponents.

Many artists will avoid sharing their values or taking a political stance. It is natural to be scared of being called names on social media. But if your values are beneficial to society, being opinionated is good for everyone. Here are some ideas you can think about:

Portrait in 3D format
Back to the bones
  1. Expressing values and beliefs: We often have deeply held values and beliefs about social, economic, and political issues. Taking a political stance allows us to support causes and policies that align with those values and beliefs. We gain support in return and build communities as a result. 
  2. Participating in democracy: Participating in the democratic process doesn’t only mean voting. It means having a say in how society is governed. By engaging in political discourse, voting, and advocating for causes, we can help shape public policies and decisions that affect our lives and the lives of others. That’s the power of influence and how it should be used. 
  3. Making a difference: By taking a political stance and advocating for causes and policies that align with their values, artists can make a positive difference in the world and contribute to social and political change. Isn’t “changing the world” why we are all here? 
  4. Holding leaders accountable: By taking a political stance, and publishing our beliefs in the public domain, we can hold elected officials and other leaders accountable for their actions. This can help ensure that leaders are responsive to the needs and interests of their constituents and are held accountable for any negative impacts of their policies.

Taking a political stance does not necessarily mean aligning yourself with a political party or ideology. Instead, it means advocating for specific causes that you believe will have a positive impact on society.

If there is a cause that you feel passionate about, gather your thoughts and do some research. Reach out to others who have similar ideas. If your present audience does not agree with your stance, then be grateful for the chance to attract new supporters. I hope that you are fortunate, because then you will find that yours is the voice everyone has been waiting for.

Notes: Artwork for this post was generously provided by my fabulous friend, UK based 3D artist Pinxx. You can follow her on Instagram and keep up with her latest posts. And collect her artwork on Makers Place (ETH) or Objkt (tez). You’ll be happy you did. Thank you and have a fabulous week ahead.

Categories
about me artificial intelligence creative writing entrepreneurs men news opinion People technology

Content moderation at Elon Musk’s Twitter


Forget the Twitter Files, citizen journalism, or profit-sharing for creators. Elon Musk’s Twitter has one priority, and that is Elon Musk. It appears that he bought the company so he could broadcast his message without interference from legacy media. And it is possible, and this is only a theory, that he bought it because he wants to own a recognised media brand. I’m thinking of his 15-year feud with Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Post. 

The majority of legacy media is against Elon Musk because they know that Twitter has given the power back to people with its no-biased censorship.

Twitter takeover has changed the media forever – for the good. @elonmusk

Originally tweeted by DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) on January 29, 2023.

People think Musk wasted $44 billion ‘on an app’. It is not an odd choice when you realise that he has paid about $119.56 per user so that he can freely promote his businesses to them. (That figure is based on 368 million unique monthly users). 

If you’re on Twitter, what does content moderation look like? The latest change is that the smart technology has been showing you more posts from accounts you don’t follow. If you’re Elon Musk, your tweets will be shown to potentially 368 million unique users. But in reality, they are being shown to lots of people who will simply scroll past. Because of these changes, your follower count doesn’t matter as much as it used to. Engagement is key to content moderation. 

And though this reality is clear, content management is still incredibly frustrating. The ideas I shared in my earlier posts are still useful. In fact, they are more relevant now that the platform is focused on ‘real people talking to each other’. In light of certain new developments, I want to share some ideas and strategies that will help you to optimise your presence on the platform. 

Let’s focus on content moderation. Content moderation on Twitter is still facilitated by smart technology, or machine learning systems. But after Elon Musk fired more than 50% of the tech staff, the remaining staff have needed to make adjustments. They need time to write millions of lines of code in order to trial Musk’s hare-brained ideas, or to write useless reports for one of his lackeys. Then, they need to work overtime to press the “undo” button 10,000 times after trials are met with backlash. 

Perhaps their efficient retasking of the smart technology (by making it ultra sensitive) has led to more intense sorting of tweets, keywords, and accounts into silos. Silos are groups of accounts or tweets, based on keywords and common areas of interest. Read more on how sentiment analysis software helps make those decisions.

The system was always sensitive to your scrolling actions. Even a momentary pause is noticed by the software. And it reads your direct messages. Quite a number of people believe that direct messages are “unseen”. And they would be wrong. Everything you type, either in a public tweet, or in a direct message, helps the system to make decisions about the standing of your account. 

One other priority for the smart tech is to eliminate spam. The system is trained to filter out spam aggressively. Musk wants more organic views from your account, and if the system is overwhelmed by spam, you will not see his tweets. 

Twitter owner Elon Musk tweeted out this dot which generated news headlines and over 52 million views.

Based on observations of user accounts, the best way to get added to a spam list is to send lots of private messages to tweeters who don’t reply back. Other actions? Overtweeting, tweeting the same media (image, GIF, video) multiple times in a day, or replying to tweets and not getting a reply back. These are some actions which are read by the system as either “not engaging with other accounts” or “tweeters don’t like this account”. 

Remember what I said about accounts getting siloed? If your account (A) does any of the above actions and engages with another account (B), this account (B) will be flagged as, “account B is attracting spam accounts like A.” Then, people engaging with B’s tweets will be added to a list marked “accounts interacting with this account B which is in the group with account A”. This is a weird chain reaction that has affected a lot of perfectly legitimate accounts. And it’s unfair.

The phenomenon of people locking their Twitter account with the hope that it will improve engagement is a strange phenomenon. They’re performing a digital ritual to make themselves seen. Doing a little rain dance, but they’re trying to summon views instead of precipitation.

Deprived of any meaningful power, people have become convinced their only influence lies in the visibility of their content. So of course they’re willing to try these little tricks and quasi-spells to spread their content and maximize their power.

Originally tweeted by Travis View (@travis_view) on February 1, 2023.

Recently, quite a few tweeters (including me) have tried locking our accounts to test the idea that our tweets would be further boosted among our subscribers. This worked very well, but it is a glitch and only a temporary fix. Fortunately, I have tested more reliable ways for you to fix your engagement. They’re presented here in no particular order.

  • Block spam accounts as soon as they follow you. Or, remove their follow from your settings on the desktop device/web browser. Do not unfollow many accounts at once, as this will look spammy. Go slowly.  
  • If you already get lots of engagement on your tweets, start restricting replies to people you follow. This will prevent bots from leaving comments on your tweets. Again, bot replies will make your account look spammy if you don’t hide them. 
  • Reply to everyone who comments on your tweets. 
  • Ask subscribers to turn on notifications for your tweets. Only ask for this if you don’t tweet every 10 minutes. Imagine hundreds of people rage blocking you for constantly interrupting them. You will feel bad, so think twice about this. 
  • Use the “following” tab to find active users. Reply to their tweets and invite a response. After 4 – 6 hours, go to your profile and delete replies (and tweets) that received no views or likes. Some people you follow are too busy to reply because they are busy tweeting. You can tell by the cascade of consecutive tweets (not part of a thread) that show up in your feed.
     
  • Ask more of your followers to subscribe to your blog (because you have one). And remind them to keep up with you that way. Remember that owning your own domain is the best engagement hack ever. 

Twitter is in utter chaos at the moment, but remember that it is a private company devoted to serving its owner’s emotional needs. He needs a breathtaking amount of attention. When I was writing notes for this post, he had posted a dot to his timeline, and it has already generated 52 million views. We are all enablers at this point. And until Elon Musk decides to let someone new play with his joystick, he will remain our fiercest competitor. 

Postscript: February 10, 2023. Another day, another dot tweet. If it is not yet obvious that Mr Musk seeks validation in Twitter engagement (views, likes, retweets, comments), here you go. When the personality decides what the algorithms will prioritise, it is helpful to focus on what is driving the person’s behaviour.

Update: February 11, 2023. Article on Elon Musk throwing a tantrum over low view counts for his tweets. Underscores the purpose of the “point” tweets. And I reiterate the point I made in the beginning of this post – Musk’s motivation is to get attention. Quite a lot of system errors, glitches and outages are caused by the lack of staff to monitor servers that run the platform. But a qualified engineer was fired for not saying what the boss wanted to hear. People are right to focus on the man himself if these are his priorities.

Update: February 15, 2023. Daily Beast is reporting (from a report on Platformer) that Elon did actually mess with Twitter algorithm to juice his own numbers. Adding this here because I was told that Mr Musk’s personality had NOTHING to do with navigating the algorithm. In other words, my initial analysis, which is that Mr Musk’s plan was to use Twitter to poke the eyeballs of all active users on the platform, was correct. And this would be obvious to anyone paying attention to his tweets (like this one his tech staff jacked up to 55 million impressions). At this point being part of this billionaire’s glorification milk tea party is really a choice to remain uninformed. And in response to allegations, here is the tweet from Mr Musk’s account acknowledging that he ordered his staff to mess with the algo so everyone would see his tweets in their feed. I find this quite disgusting.

Update: February 28, 2023. This drama keeps devolving and I’m here for it. I thought mansplaining had died out with the #metoo era but apparently dinosaurs/throwbacks still roam the earth. This is why I’m adding more evidence that Elon Musk, owner of Twitter, is a giant bung and this directly affects how Twitter operates. And here we are, look at how he unceremoniously fired the staff who pledged their allegiance. One executive slept on the office floor to deliver the impossible and help him save face after he bought Twitter and made it weird. He fired her, too. But not before doing an informal peer review and destroying the Slack channels which helped the engineers to troubleshoot problems. There are now fewer than 1800 people working at the company and that means, like I said, the machine learning software (smart technology) is mostly running the platform. This is why I said that tweeters must be careful about triggering the protocols that will get their accounts shadowbanned or siloed.

Update: April 7, 2023. In a new case of a snake eating it’s tail

Update: June 22, 2023. Matt is back on Twitter but as you can see now Mr musk has decided to ban academic terms. Mostly because he’s bored.

Categories
Mars men news opinion science fiction technology

Sam Bankman-Fried, the FTX scandal, and the allure of Elon Musk 

The FTX implosion has been called one of the biggest financial frauds in American history. Before Manhattan lawyers read out their case against Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO had been enjoying puff pieces in the New York Times and Forbes, among other publications. 

I had an epiphany while watching a Senate hearing about the FTX scandal. John Ray, the current CEO of the company, has said that he has never seen such levels of incompetence and slackness in his entire business career. And this man helped unwind Enron. Remember Enron? So what do Sam Bankman-Fried and the FTX crypto exchange scandal have to do with Elon Musk? The answer is quite simple. But we need a preamble.

Elon Musk recently spent $44 billion to acquire Twitter. He borrowed most of the money from his Saudi / Emirati friends. And he said he was considering taking a loan from SBF himself. In a push to improve citizen journalism on the platform, Musk worked to drive up user activity by tweeting some terrible things.

Now what can we say about Elon Musk’s allure? He is alluring to the people who believe that fiat currency is nonsense. They believe that by day trading, you can flip coins, and from the modest investment of $10, become a millionaire at the flip of a switch. Of course, I believe it’s wonderful to aspire to do more than flip burgers and get paid a minimum wage. But once upon a time, this used to be a way to pay for college or technical school.

In my opinion, these people routinely smudge the line between reality and fiction. And they reject anyone who tries to instil in them in a sense of reality. For them, Elon Musk is not really a person. He is an aspirational totem, a person who skipped the blah blah stuff and got to the fun times. You know: thinking, analysis, conversations, feedback, resistance, and hardships.

An example of the wishful thinking sales pitch. Most of the people in the comments were trying to talk to her about how unrealistic her statement was.

Some of these people believe that the planet Mars, even though it barely has an atmosphere, is perfectly suited to be a habitat for humans, and we will go there on Starship. And even though the soil itself is so toxic that you can’t grow food in it, they’re ready to leave Earth. 

These Musk fans don’t bother to pose difficult questions because they believe that asking difficult questions will slow things down. They don’t realise that questions drive innovation. Confusion encourages engineers to make things work better. In fact, their dream car, the Lamborghini, is designed and built by people with actual attention spans.

For them, the world of scientific enquiry is a place where boring people go to do boring things. Not only that, boring people don’t find evacuating their bowels in the morning to be a sterling achievement to be announced in a tweet. 

And these were the reasons why a person like Bankman-Fried was allegedly able to run a company with zero oversight. And to loan himself, according to the prosecution’s case, billions of dollars of users’ money.

You see, people who believe in miracles think that checks and balances are trying to stop them from becoming “independently wealthy”. What they believe, or what they are told to believe, doesn’t have to be true, rational or attainable, as long as it sounds good and feels good. 

In case you thought I was exaggerating about their obsession with being on the toilet.

“I will give away $2 billion,” said SBF. And after looking at some data, he must have decided something like, “I will wear a stretched out T-shirt, unwashed shorts and some janky socks. I will try to look like my dude bro customers.” 

After the money was lost, SBF told a journalist that looking janky was all branding. And it worked because his supporters believed it. They were not entertaining any due diligence. I believe that if you were to scroll through their Twitter timelines, you would see that people trying warn them about what was going on were told to shut the hell up.

Categories
art creative writing fiction news opinion technology TV women writing

What revolution?


Fabric swatches on canvas with makeshift cardboard frames
Fabric swatches on canvas

The Netflix film, 365 Days, is not the worst film ever made. That distinction belongs to the threequel, The Next 365 Days. And this is according to journos who got paid to write nice things about it. The films are based on the series of novels by Polish author, Blanka Lipińska.

According to the Daily Beast’s Kevin Fallon, stories like 365 Days serve an important purpose. They allow us to watch as the inversion of our values play out in real world scenarios. And as we watch the scenes play out, our tablet or TV screens shield us from the consequences.

Sketchbook doodle from Charlie Esposito

Now, I think that as we broadcast disapproval of fan-fiction hot sex, we are avoiding the real hot topics. We might tell ourselves that we are staying neutral on those issues. But there is no political fence, not really.

Based on my experiences on social media over the past year, these are some questions I feel like asking people I am meeting for the first time:

Are you all in on a multicultural society? Can same-sex couples get married if they want? Can people with wombs please get a prescription filled without a pharmacist asking them to pee on a stick so their religious rules are not broken?

Dr. Emily Porter finds that medical professionals doing their job is going to be very frustrating

Neutrality is a nice word that means we are scared of saying what we think in case someone screams in our faces. Being human is already a lot of work, which is why we elect public officials to help us out. Yet, we keep electing representatives who won’t let us get on with living. They create legislation on matters that should remain private; and drag their feet on issues that are in the public’s interest. This is precisely the reason why more of us are speaking out.

With all of that in the background, I now ask you to consider the artist’s work during times of struggle. One of the best things about being an artist is that we usually end up collaborating to start a movement. The movement is whatever we choose to call it. We make noise as a collective, and people pay attention to our message.

Medusa Marie is on Twitter. Follow her for more fabulous visual art.

Unfortunately, the creative space is most vulnerable to interference. Because we artists are living in a society filled with outrage, our worst enemy becomes what we think others want from us. Fear stifles our productivity. But if we don’t make things, we cannot refine our process and become better artists.

Artists are people with feelings, and this makes us easy targets. And people use their own reactions to our relatively benign creations as an excuse to avoid the draft.

If you are a hobbyist critic, should you pack up and leave? Not so fast. There is still time to get some real work done.

Find balance in everything you do. drawing of stones balanced on top of each other.
“Find balance in everything you do” Artwork by MHBB via Twitter

Here are some people who will benefit from your support: Women, children, minority ethnic groups, refugees, the homeless, the starving, the physically challenged, the mentally unwell, recovering addicts and the orphaned. Dial up your voice to the usual strength. Vote for representatives who can help. Keep writing letters to them until they mobilise resources to alleviate pain and suffering.

Fairies are real and help us achieve our dreams as we sleep. AI assisted digital painting by Simply Veronica.
Fairies are real and assist us in our dreams – artwork by Simply Veronica

The revolution calls you to the draft. There is no need to burn your old scripts. Find a new cause, make some edits, and read them again. You might need a change of costume. Maybe a haircut. Or perhaps a 15-minute session on IG Live will get the ball rolling. The energy expenditure will leave you exhausted and restless. But soon enough, someone will hear you. And then, they will listen.

Good luck out there.

❤️

Postscript: Big shout outs to my lovely friends, Charlie Esposito, Medusa Marie, MHBB, and Simply Veronica. Thank you very much for responding to that last-minute request. Keep inspiring everyone with your activism and hard work.

Categories
celebrity creative writing entrepreneurs men news writing

Curtis Richardson: Rihanna’s multi-platinum music producer chats with Charles Myambo


Happy Saturday, everyone. In this post, you will meet the multiplatinum music producer Curtis Richardson, who has written songs with Jennifer Lopez, produced music for Rihanna, and worked with David Guetta, Tiësto and John Legend. He is speaking with the fabulous celebrity interviewer, Charles Myambo.

How was it working with Jennifer Lopez?

Well, I first started working with Jennifer Lopez before she was mainstream. She came at a time where the world was itching for a breakout Latina star. At the time, its safe to say that Jennifer Lopez was a pioneer, not only in the US, but also around the world. To date, she is one of the biggest stars worldwide, but it was not always this way. Jennifer was extremely hardworking and determined when I first started working with her. She had a day job and needed to balance that with recording music. Combine all that with the pressure of being a Latina entertainer during a time where not many like her were global superstars, and you can see how Jennifer Lopez was a pioneer. To this day, she is one of my favourite artists to work with. 

Curtis Richardson

What are your thoughts on musicians becoming huge without the help of a record label?

You have to understand that record labels are like machines when it comes to artist promotion. The top tier record labels are exceptional at branding artists and giving them exposure to a global audience. If your question is whether artists can be filthy rich without record labels, then the answer is definitely yes. ChanceThaRapper for instance, is independent and extremely well-off. However, if your question is whether an artist can become as big as Nicki Minaj or Drake without a record label, then I have to say no. Not impossible but it is extremely difficult.

The room on Clubhouse

What tough-love advice would you have for aspiring musicians today?

It’s not easy. The music industry is very much cutthroat. You can gain or lose relevance so quickly. The volatility of music fans is simply astonishing and without careful planning and strategy, almost any artist can start becoming irrelevent very quickly. Obviously, you have your Beyoncé, Snoop Dogg, and JLo, who are household names globally and they are unlikely to ever become irrelevant. However, that’s part of the issue.

Fight about it

We have young artists who try and mimic exactly what these huge stars are doing while failing to understand that it took years for those superstars to be able to produce one album without promoting it on Instagram and it becomes a hit. Today’s artists need to understand that the music game costs money, requires time and effort, demands creativity, and also social media platforms such as TikTok and Facebook to promote upcoming tracks. Artists also have to be willing to adapt to trend changes in order to become relevant and perhaps even one day become the trendsetters.

If you don’t feel like quitting, your dream isn’t big enough

Do you feel like a celebrity?

No not really. Never feel too comfortable. You can always achieve more. Pride is the enemy of progress.

What was the most difficult part about the pandemic for you?

I love travelling, and I couldn’t travel as much as I really wanted.

It’s not that deep, baby

What is one major thing still left on your checkbox?

I’d love to travel more. I’d like to explore more of the world than I have already. Gain more new perspectives through learning about different cultures, music, ethnicities and heritage. 

👀

Thank you for reading this interview, which was provided by Charles Myambo. Follow him on Instagram. Charles is an actuarial scientist by day. And by night, he is founder of the celebrity networking community, Team Smooth. Since 2019, he has worked with hundreds of celebrities from all over the world. Team Smooth has a vision of presenting the community outreach of celebrities and some of the world’s most notable names and brands. Their mission is to spark positive change in the world by bringing awareness to worthy causes and communities.

Categories
entrepreneurs news opinion technology

NFT Marketplaces: A Competitive Megathread

Creative photography entitled Burning Issues. And NFT collection by Raecreateart.
From the collection Burning Issues by Raecreateart


Hello everyone. I hope you’ve had a great start to 2022. To start my year on a productive note, I have done lots of reading and talked with prominent players in blockchain technology investments. No two investors agree on the best investment approach, so my solution has been to try and understand their mindset. In my opinion, it is really important to grow a strategy play based on your own knowledge, connections, and risk tolerance.

Why is this important for creators? We should be thinking about investing some of our income to fund creative projects or startups and to build a nest egg for retirement. Eventually, I will be publishing informative posts on NFTs (digital assets stored in smart contracts on a blockchain), blockchain infrastructure, smart contracts, and cryptocurrencies. Each of these topics exists in its own ecosystem. The main ideas here are registration of ownership, a decentralised protocol for validating transactions, and platforms for creating and trading tokens. At the end of this megathread, you will see links for further reading.

None of the views expressed here are financial advice. Please do your own research, as always.

January 7, 2022 recorded conversation on passive income via Twitter Spaces

Intro
One of the first questions I am asked after “What are NFTs?” is “Where should I sell them?” Today’s post will give you some guidance through a discussion of NFT marketplaces. This presentation was first published on October 13, 2021 by Mide, an angel investor and crypto trading expert I met on Twitter Spaces. He published a megathread on his Twitter timeline to discuss his outlook on marketplaces for non-fungible tokens. So far, players with real world skills are entering the community. And they are bringing marketing expertise, professional teams, and networking skills to a market that is saturated with art. These newcomers will be competitive if they can offer tangible value to collectors. Marketplaces will then compete to provide a platform for the most popular project owners, and depending on the outcome of the negotiations, primary market collectors will benefit.

The original thread by Mide published on Twitter

Megathread
NFTs. They are everywhere these days. And if you’ve ever bought or sold one, you probably did it on Open Sea. The world’s largest NFT marketplace has handled a whopping $8 billion worth of transactions since the start of 2021.

The success of NFTs is no longer a point of discussion. Rather, it makes sense to think about the continued success of Open Sea as a marketplace. In the latter months of 2021, there was a surge in rival NFT marketplaces, many aiming for the top spot. So, is Open Sea under threat? That is what I want to explore today.

In the summer of 2021, the earliest sign of an Open Sea competitor came from one of the largest decentralized exchanges, SushiSwap. Sushi has announced its own NFT platform called Shoyu (meaning soy sauce in Japanese). The platform is currently in the final stages of development. Shoyu’s main advantages are integration with existing Sushi Swap protocols and the distribution of transaction fees to SUSHI token holders.

However, from the SHOYU NFT teasers released so far, the marketplace looks more like a competitor to Super Rare than OpenSea. This is because it targets individual artists and art collectors rather than NFT flippers (people who buy NFTs and resell them for a bigger profit).

The next marketplace that caught my eye is the newly launched Infinity. Entering the scene in October, 2021, Infinity has been trying to lure Open Sea users to its platform with the promise of a token airdrop (free tokens sent directly to wallets visible on the Open Sea platform).

Anyone who has spent more than 0.02 ETH ($US 62) on OpenSea can claim a bag of Infinity tokens if they spend an equal amount of ETH on the Infinity marketplace. Additionally, Infinity aims to be community-driven and completely decentralized, with user governance coming from holders of the airdropped tokens. Infinity even admits that it uses the same smart contracts as Open Sea. The Infinity developers are transparent about trying to lure users away from Open Sea in a so-called “vampire attack.”

On the centralised exchange side, there is a new offering from FTX US. The exchange’s latest marketplace launched in October. It offers a much-needed improvement to NFT trading on Solana. It also provides a safer and more intuitive way to discover NFTs. At present, FTX only supports Solana NFTs but has said it intends to add support for Ethereum-based NFTs soon. FTX already runs an NFT marketplace and users can bid on experiences like a match in the popular League of Legends game.

Finally, we have Coinbase NFTs. Nasdaq’s first cryptocurrency exchange says that it will help creators to flourish on the exchange. In the announcement of its waitlist, it said that “by fostering connections, Coinbase NFT will help creators, collectors, and fans build community.” However, despite the optimism of this presentation, it is newcomer FTX that has the biggest chance of dethroning Open Sea, in my opinion. The platform has proven that it will get what it wants. It has also spent millions on marketing and promotional partnerships. It has already made a name for itself as a provider of cryptocurrency derivates, and I believe that it will be able to achieve the same level of success with NFTs.

Fin

Further reading

Ethereum Whitepaper
Ethereum Foundation

The Year in Ethereum 2020
Josh Stark and Evan Van Ness via Medium

Why I’m bearish on Ethereum
Tascha Labs

Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v 0.8.13
Solana Project

$LUNA Investment strategy discussion on Twitter Spaces (recorded)

Categories
about me art creative writing fashion fiction news women

All Hallows’ Chic

Sylva and Tee Nightmare

Recently collected is the spectacular nonfungible token from Keith Allen Phillips on Hic et Nunc. The blurb reads, “Sylva and Tee – Nightmare. If you wake up to this at the end of your bed, do you run or do you stay? This is Sylva Hattington with Tee Marie modeling some of Sylva’s amazing creations.”

Will be checking my stats in about six hours to find out exactly how many eyeballs were clapped on this image, all 7MB of it. If you thought your eyes were going to fall out, wait until you see the rest of Keith’s collection. (Don’t look.)

And if you want to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth, I was drawn to the portraits because of the headdresses. I love headdresses and finding out these were designed by a woman made this token a must-have. Maybe it’s because I’m such an introvert and I need a shell in which to retreat.

Tea Time by Gimme

Then, collected last Sunday, was Tea Time by Thai artist GIMME because I have a thing for skulls carved out of crystals. The artist was featured in an earlier post on 3D NFT artists. I thought that nothing could make them scream, but they freaked out when I told them I was going to collect this token.

Now, if you want a nightmare story for Halloween, it should be about my dysfunctional love life. Without making a confession of any sort, I’ll give you the rundown as if it were the treatment for a work of fiction.

The story goes, a woman who looks disturbingly young for her age has run away from her gilded cage where she is being courted by dozens and dozens of extremely handsome suitors. As night draws near, she stumbles upon a tower at the edge of her world. The steward of the tower is a monk who has lived there, alone, for nearly thirty years. Seeing an opportunity to have all of his knowledge recorded, he seduces the woman with a promise to share his ultimate secret.

In exchange, she must work with him to write down every miracle he has ever performed. The woman agrees because she is in love. And as she studies his alchemy, she suspects that his insights are pedantic filler. His proclaimed power over the material world could be the stuff of fantasy. In order to save herself, she embarks on a search for her true soulmate. Does he exist, and will she find him in time?

Have a safe and blessed Halloween.