Categories
art creative writing fiction news opinion technology TV women writing

What’s missing? The context of cancel culture

The essence of cancel culture 

One thing Generation X can take credit for is that we grew up with tangible media. These included books, newspapers, handwritten letters, postcards, vinyl records, cassette and VHS tapes, cinemas, stages, and physical photo albums. My theory is that as children, as we interacted with these objects, our brains grew to truly understand the meaning of “context.” 

When we closed a book, the story ended, at least, until we were ready to continue reading. We knew, without being told, that what we read in a newspaper was different from the dialogue in a novel. One story was based on fact, and the other was totally made up. When you pushed the eject button, the VHS tape popped out of the VCR, and the movie was over. Currently, we buy vinyl records from specialty stores; visit galleries to look at paintings; take walks in the park; and take photos with film cameras. So what’s missing, and why are we so miserable? 

In our digital age, I believe that more and more of us are losing the capacity to separate content (and text) from context. And it makes us more anxious because the stories we are fed never have an exit button so we can shut them down. When people can’t unplug, we see cancel culture, where some people are publicly shamed for saying or doing things that others consider offensive or unacceptable. 

Of course, there is plenty out there that is offensive or unacceptable. But in a culture of instant gratification and self-affirming narratives, those definitions are changing constantly. And this is why cancel culture makes us miserable. Our brains are struggling to place things in the proper context. We get frustrated quickly and destroy things instead of turning them off.

Consider the context

And this is not a Millennial/Gen Z issue. It happens even with Generation X. Look at one Gen-Xer’s comment on a coronation declaration I wrote for my second novel. The story is set in a fictional country, Maitheland, in an alternate timeline to this one, in 2033. The main Orthodox religion in that timeline is also fictional.

The ecclesiastical portion of a coronation scene? [This story must] be set pre-20th Century because there aren’t too many of those anymore. The last was Britain’s Elizabeth II in 1953. Spain’s King Juan Carlos I just swore a Freemasonic oath of office in 1975. Which explains why the contemporary Spanish monarchy has been such a disaster.

Reader’s comment

I found this response to my work unsettling because it disregarded the stated context of the declaration. The characters I wrote about are not based on any existing royal family. Was it necessary to question the historical provenance of a fictional ceremony?

While this was not a cancellation, it is an example of judgement out of context. This is the essence of cancel culture. Instead of observing and noticing things from a distance, people try to write themselves into a situation.

As I mentioned in the introduction, tangible media like books, vinyl records, and photo albums helped to shape my generation’s understanding of context through storytelling. These objects provided concrete instances for our developing brains to sort out the differences between real and made-up events. However, as we consume more interactive media, we are able to write ourselves into any story even when we are not invited to do so.

Stories and empathy development

Stories helped us to learn how to be the underdog, the prince, the fighter jet pilot, or the ambulance driver. High quality stories were better at helping us to use our imagination. They also helped us develop critical thinking skills. With every reading, we had the chance to experience the story from a new character’s perspective. During playtime, we created costumes and designed our own immersive environments. A lot of the things we did during playtime helped us to connect with our bodies and be aware of the world around us. Later, that awareness could be transferred to an understanding of the physical and emotional experiences of others. 

Nowadays, we are trained to talk about ourselves and do frequent checks for engagement. When we are constantly being judged and criticised, we may become less likely to express ourselves honestly for fear of being ostracised. Ironically, this can cause us to be less compassionate towards each other. Instead of making people better, cancel culture can lead to decreased empathy.

I feel that our brains are becoming more vulnerable to stress and anxiety because we use the same devices to do a range of things: work, play, communicate, relax, stay fit, and study. Adding to this problem is the blurring of lines when real events are used to create entertaining stories, or when fictional events are used to comment on current social issues. For example, we see grown men posting videos on YouTube in which they complain that Disney’s The Little Mermaid cast a young woman with tan complexion to “attack fathers.” Of course, the film was made for children but these men were outraged anyway.

The more we adapt to changing technologies, the more we forget the guidance that helped us to become sensible people. As adults we hear the term “work life balance”. It suggests that we need to relax, but we are not specifically reminded that we should focus on the physical world.

Instead, we are encouraged to do “adulting” activities on our favourite social media platforms. There, we watch someone painting a wall, comment as someone cooks a meal, and then listen as a book we purchased is analysed for us. Even romantic partners are taught that relationship maintenance is as easy as watching TV shows together.

Eventually, constant stimulation from being online becomes overwhelming. The blurring of lines between real and fictional events can lead to anxiety and stress. Instead of reducing that stress by logging off, many of us respond by attempting to control the individuals who appear on our screens.

Outro: Read printed books

There are plenty of stories to read, and we are buying more than a billion printed books every year. But are we turning the pages? Effective communication, conflict resolution, teamwork, empathy, and resilience are themes we can find in books. Turning the pages of a book tells our brain that we are following characters on a journey. By witnessing their struggles, we subconsciously construct templates for addressing similar challenges in our own lives.

Interacting with characters in our minds also helps us to empathise with ourselves. We need to be kind to ourselves in order to be resilient. As we grow stronger, we will become less interested in forcing other people to do (or say) what we want. 

The evolving landscape of digital media consumption is bringing up new challenges for future generations to resolve. Thankfully, the studies that have been conducted suggest that digital media can play a role in shaping our empathy and resilience. I believe that there is a conscious effort among us to use digital media to foster empathy and understanding. But there’s a physical world out there with things we can enjoy, too. We should remember that our minds are delicate. And if any of us had the right guidance in our developing years, now is a good time to reflect on the many soft skills they have taught us.

By ΠιCΘLΞ

Life is short, so let’s be decent.

23 replies on “What’s missing? The context of cancel culture”

I hadn’t thought of the finite nature of physical media providing on and off ramps to stories, but this makes so much sense!

I often wonder why people feel compelled to center themselves in everything they consume, but you’re so right. If you’re interacting with the world through screens, what separates life from story? And furthermore, if we’re on devices all day telling stories about ourselves, then we read simply to signal or react. “I am X kind of person because I read this. I am Y type of person because this upsets me.” Or worse “I am reading speculative fiction about the future but I’m an expert on Ecclesiastical coronations and must insert my knowledge here.”

Incredibly well done post. Thank you for writing it!

Liked by 1 person

I love your comment. I’m an overthinker by nature and sometimes connections get made. And yes, I think it’s not good that we’ve been trained to compulsively react to everything. Thank you so much for reading this post and adding your thoughts.

Liked by 1 person

A breathtaking and important construct regarding cancel culture, Nicole. This subject, with your approach would make a wonderful series of articles, with possibly a book that results from it.

I hosted a seniors Christmas in July lunch a couple of days ago. We did fun activities and challenged everyone’s little grey cells. With the key note speaker afterwards, we talked about when we used to write letters to friends and family, pen pals and the like. I even mentioned how as a scout so long ago we talked over long distance radio to people all around the world and even to those in Russia who were still oppressed at the time – that’s still a very palpable memory.

Sometimes, I feel like we can’t even laugh at ourselves anymore, but that’s what we need to do. The absurd needs to be put in its place, instead of becoming the norm. I rarely watch the news anymore as it has become more like current affairs and shows that used to provide in depth analysis are now just full of talking heads.

For me, regardless of what I come across, I will always sift away for the truth. Even the other day at a briefing session, I challenged a long held misconception regarding the organisation. I made no apology – the issue had finally seen the light and was no longer buried in ongoing sprouted myth – there was no way I was going to be cancelled on that issue 😊

Like

Thanks for the kind remarks. Interacting with this disengaged culture is so exhausting but if I feel inspired, I may write more. I think it’s important to have open and honest conversations about cancel culture.

I’m glad you mentioned your experience with the Christmas in July lunch. It sounds like you had a great time challenging everyone’s little grey cells. I think it’s important to find ways to laugh at ourselves and to notice the absurd.

I also agree with you that the news is now full of talking heads. It’s hard to find reliable information these days.

I’m glad to hear that you will always sift away for the truth. I think it’s important to be a truth-seeker, even when it’s difficult.

I’m inspired by your story about challenging a long-held misconception at a briefing session. It takes courage to stand up for what you believe in, even when you know you might be criticized.

Liked by 1 person

Being grounded in reality gets harder by the day – the more time we spend on our virtual online lives, the more our real lives become diluted – we should all go out and play again – even if it’s rainy.

Liked by 1 person

Agreed, because there are so many conflicting perspectives out there. We really should be trying to get back to our own “real lives” instead of living as virtual characters.

Thanks Ruthie, for the timely reminder.

Liked by 1 person

I really enjoy the premise you presented here.

I want to add that it seems like the lack of tangibility in our media and connections is a piece of this. You mentioned tapes, vhs, records… all things with physical presence. Even letters make a long lasting connection where a direct message online slips away or gets buried beneath less touching words shared.

Sympathy maybe commonplace but empathy is harder to reach when things become disposable. . . Even fashion is these days … now if only corporations and hateful ideologies were…

Like

Thanks for these thoughtful remarks. I remember writing letters. They feel more authentic than text messages or emails because you often wonder who is really typing the words. And you are correct in saying that we (humans) have really made ourselves – our experiences, our humanity and dignity – disposable by fitting in and getting along with this fast, consumable culture.

Liked by 1 person

This was a very interesting and thought-provoking post. I agree that doing everything on the same devices and not really having an ‘unplug’ method like there was before has created a much more stressful world. And people do tend to go online and obsess about things that don’t really matter like The Little Mermaid remake. I think it’s because digital reality is fast becoming most people’s main reality. Even for me, most of my social interactions happen online. And, as you said, the problem arises when those lines are blurred.

Liked by 2 people

Hello again and thanks for commenting. I think even watching people get worked up over things they’re not really interested in is stressful and weird. The creation of ‘real world implications’ is also strange. No-one should be looking to film studios for guidance on personal values, customs and vision.

Liked by 1 person

You covered so much in this post. People, I find, skim over whatever they are reading and often miss the context, even if it is there. It could be there is so much out there, from different sources and media, that a lot of people try to quickly cover everything and in doing so, miss many points being made by the author. Then they are on to the next thing without giving much thought to what they just read or viewed. There is less thinking and more reaction.

Liked by 1 person

Agreed. Thanks for your comment.

We need to proceed at a slower pace. I think that with so much information available, people who don’t seek to understand to things at a deeper level are more likely to think they can see the big picture with only a few details.

Liked by 1 person

Very thoughtful and balanced post. Definitely read more printed books. The issue with intangible media is appears so ghostly, not sure whether we can believe our eyes or just witnessing some form of afterimage. Nicely done Nicole.

Liked by 2 people

Thanks so much. I am glad you found it worth your time to read and comment. Things weighed on me over time and I thought I would reflect in a constructive way. Your remarks are much appreciated.

Liked by 1 person

Separating content from context has become far more difficult today as so many players seem to deliberately blur the boundaries. It seems almost acceptable to assert that proven facts are wrong, experts ignorant, and experience invented. God help us all when AI really gets going.

Liked by 1 person

You’re so right about this. We are going to be faced with a society divided by people thinking for themselves or having their thoughts delivered to them. That’s scary, because we see how destructive that can be right now.

Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.